Wednesday, September 13, 2006

ENTRY #950 At Night Bird's Fountain

9/11 To Me, The Lay Person

Cyn's entry HERE & HERE prompted this. I started a comment as a response, started typing and just kept on typing as I thought about it (not in one sitting- my back doesn't allow such things), so I decided to re-structure it a bit and make an entry response.

So, thanks for sharing that Cyn. You got me started. If they have NOTHING to hide, why are they hiding EVERYTHING?

And Cyn, the troll glorious that hit you over there is part of the blind followers in this once united nation. glorious supports the removal of his/her own rights. If so much wasn't at stake, glorious would be someone to pity. As it is, glorious is someone to be written off and ignored.

One thing's for sure; the bush regime will be milking 9/11 for the next couple of months- at least until the elections. THEY'VE BEEN MILKING THIS TRAGEDY FOR FIVE YEARS NOW, rolling it out from time to time for political gain or when approval polls are sagging (in the mid 30s% for 8 months in a row now).

In 1998, the PNAC wrote about how America needs to build up our military so that we can take over the oil in Iraq, Iran and then Syria. Once America controls the oil the USA will have world domination. In order to build up the military there needs to be a new Pearl Harbor."
Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor. pg 51

Like his father, Bush tries to keep a daily diary of his thoughts and observations. That night, he dictated "The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today."

The SOURCE of the above is HERE. As far as I'm concerned, coupled with the FACT that bush planned to invade Iraq before the coup of 2000- TWO YEARS BEFORE 09/11/01, THAT'S ENOUGH RIGHT THERE. I'm not an attorney however, but sometimes I wish I would have been. I'm not cooperative enough with the enemy I guess; not much of a wheeler-dealer when a conviction is at stake, so I'm sure I would've been a poor one (financially anyway). :)

Here are a few questions I think need to be asked and a response, EVEN a LIE, needs to be pressed for. Why do I say that? Because a LIE with more than one person involved can be found out- can lead to the truth with the right investigator.

1) Why was bush allowed to go into that classroom AFTER the first tower was hit? Yes, they knew before he went in! So why, at 9:03 a.m.—fifteen minutes after it was clear the United States was under terrorist attack—did President Bush sit down with a classroom of second-graders and begin a 20-minute pre-planned photo op? No one knows the answer to that question. In fact, no one has even asked Bush about it. Regardless of when he knew, HE DEFINITELY KNEW BEFORE HE ENTERED THE CLASSROOM, just ask US Navy Captain Deborah Loewer, the director of the White House Situation Room.
In fact, bush has slipped up and said three times now that he knew before he was informed by Captain Loewer- that he watched the first plane hit on TV- from his limousine. THE FIRST PLANE HIT WASN'T ON TV. Oh that was just a memory lapse...three times? In three different years? BS. Closed circuit?

a) How did his "handlers" know that he wasn't a target that day?
b) How did they know the children were safe?
c) And if they didn't, isn't that gross incompetence?

2)Why were U.S. jet fighters ordered to stand down? All they do is train for a situation like that. One finally happens and THEY DO NOTHING. I'm not convinced that CINC NORAD, General Eberhardt was at fault. Its my belief that he was ordered to stand down. I can think of no other plausible explanation. To my knowlege, General Eberhardt has never had to "fall on the sword", so there you go.

3)Why were the bin Ladens and affiliates "secretly" flown out of Florida on September 12, 2001? The entire country was under a "no fly law" for three days.

a)Whom did the Saudis call to request government approval of the flights?

b)Who in the government coordinated approval of the flights?

c)Did the FBI receive any communications from the White House about the urgency of permitting these individuals to leave the country?

d)Did any Justice Department or FBI officials express reservations or objections to the decisions?

4)Why was there not even one speck of airplane wreckage at the Pentagon? And why was the hole (from the impact) only a few feet wide?

5)Why did the FAA destroy ALL of their tapes from the morning of 9/11/01? I BELIEVE THAT'S CALLED EVIDENCE!

The 9/11 tragedy that bush has continually used as a distraction and/or for political gain is totally and completely ABSURD! Only an idiot would believe any of the official story. bush's seizing upon the emotions of this nation's people for fearmongering and, in his own words, "to catapult the propaganda" is disgusting. ITS NOTHING MORE THAN A GREAT (bush created) OPPORTUNITY FOR AN ENDLESS WAR ON TERROR (again bush created)!

He must be smiling (between the frequent temper tantrums) behind closed doors in the White House.

We all know one thing. The chain of command ENDS at george duh-bya bush.

If you want to make an informed decision it really is difficult because they have tried their best to cover everything up. The problem with this, for them, is that there are just too many people involved. And people slip up sometimes. People "paint themselves into a corner" sometimes. And then sometimes there are people who find out things they shouldn't.

That's why the boyking refused to testify to the commission under oath. That's why his handlers knew that he'd need a "puppy eater" by his side and sent his Uncle Dick with him. That's why Sibel Edmonds was gagged. That's why Stanley Hilton's lawsuit was thrown out of court and I quote the court here:
"a sitting president and his cabinet officers are immune from any civil lawsuits for any acts done in office." And let's not forget David Kelly. Or the Downing Street memo.

This site has culled quite an extensive indictment on the whole thing and they've used public testimony, public facts and mainstream media to deliver it. You can bookmark it, pick & choose & refer to it any time. I know I've learned a lot by just looking at a small portion of what's available. And to be honest here, my questions above aren't really questions as far as I'm concerned. I'm pretty sure I know enough of the real 9/11 story to make my own decisions about what really happened.

Mirror entry at DSb2

All rights reserved.
Disclaimer And Comment Policy